![]() ![]() "No licenses or payments are required for a user to stream or distribute content in AAC format. or one per needed codec I should say (in my case AAC and AC3). I'm with others that if we can't get auto-graphing of the CODECs, then I'd pay a bit extra for. ![]() This audio thing seems like it is the LAST barrier, and really Resolve is now the ONE app I have to resort to booting back into windows for. It's a few terabytes in all (yes I've love taking video!) so I'd really like to avoid any intermediate transcoding. I'm SUPER impressed with the GPU accelerated neural performance on Studio! But, I have years worth of home movies which are both AAC (phone and cameras), and AC3 audio (m2ts/mts / AVCHD). I just made the switch from w10 to Mint, and everything I've tried so far (save audio codecs) seems to work incredibly well. They can just use the CODEC that ships with the system.ĭoes anyone know a way to get Resolve to use existing libs/APIs to auto connect (or preconfigure for) various audio codecs, at least for decode if not also encode? Similar to how other Linux media players, and Windows and Mac (if I'm not mistaken)?.įor example /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfaad.so.2 for AAC? Or if that's also it's own license issue (compiling against those libs), doesn't Linux have an audio API that accessed the non-codec specific (decompressed) audio? I still think supporting Enterprise Distros that ship the CODECs would be a great option, that way they don't have to worry about licensing it. Apple's "superiority" has always hinged on its CODECs being industry standard or ubiquitous in certain industries - not on breadth of support.įor Linux users, this issue is completely different. Windows has pretty much ALWAYS had superior out of the box CODEC support to macOS, in recent history. ![]() It's better off left to the individual solution/software developers.Īside from that, Windows has native AAC CODECs, so I'm not even understanding this reply. Economically it makes little sense to license those, because they are fairly industry specific and the license costs would have to be negligible for it to make sense. ![]() It just doesn't have support for Apple's proprietary CODECs like ProRes, the same way Apple doesn't ship WMV/WMA support out of the box. Windows is way better than macOS when it comes to CODEC support out of the box. That's why I think a paid option to add more/better codecs for Studio would be a good idea. Trensharo wrote:Windows is actually pretty good about what Decoders and Encoders they provide. This answers why I am having issues with all audio encoded MP4s on Studo via Linux. Right now the MP4 export is pretty much useless without audio lol So AAC en- and decoding shouldn't be an issue? I think most distributions are equipped with ffmpeg nowadays anyway. Still wouldn't fix the "ProRes issue," though it would handle cases like H.264/HEVC and AAC. the cost of the CODEC license is in the cost of the OS purchase/subscription)? Maybe they should support only Enterprise Distros that ship with these CODECs out of the box (i.e. Everything just worked, the same way it does on Windows 10 or macOS. That being said, when I used to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux | Workstation, they would distribute all of these CODECs with the system out of the box. Of course, ProRes isn't going to be one of them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |